I did not feel that it undermined her supposed “heroic act”. In the first place I would not exactly call her decision to leave heroic. Indeed it was sad that she felt that she had to leave her children behind but I understood her motivation. I felt that she took such a drastic action because she did not want to influence her children to be like her, she would not want them to live only to please another and never know who they were or what truly made them happy as individuals. It seemed that her decision to leave her marriage was based on the sudden disillusionment she felt when her husband did not instinctually react as she would have; he did not try to “take the bullet for her”, cared more for his reputation. Therefore, it seemed that her motivation was based on not only her disillusionment in terms of her husband but also her sudden lack of love for her husband. She had lived her life first for her father and later for her husband, she talked about how she adopted each ones opinions as her own and never questioned them. Until this pivotal moment when she realizes that Helmer’s devotion is not like hers does she understand that above being a mother and a wife she must first be a “reasonable human being”. Her believe that she was doing the right thing could, I suppose, make her seem heroic because she was willing to give up her comfortable life, and more importantly her children to not only find out who she was but to also prevent her children from becoming her.
An ending that would involve Nora not leaving not leaving her children would change the meaning of the story drastically, it would undermine it. The resonance and realization that is so central to this work would have been missing with a different ending. Situations in which sacrifice does not have to be made are somewhat pointless because it is the struggle that underlies interaction. Just because a story has a happier ending does not make it a better one. Going off of what Nora explains to Helmer, she needs to figure out who she is before she can help anyone else. Maybe one day she will find her way back to them but in the meantime realizing that she is not the mother she feels she should be has decided her fate in the story. She cannot understand a world in which a daughter cannot spare her dying father worry or save her husbands life and until she understands she feels that she is of no use to her family. It felt like more than trying to be heroic, Nora was just trying to save herself and spare her children. She realized that understanding herself and the world can only come about through reflection and through someone teaching her, yet she realizes that Helmer is not the one to reach her, he essentially already failed her. Therefore taking into account that much of the importance of the story would have been lost I feel that had Nora decided to stay with her family she would have failed herself. Every person deserves the right to know themselves and she is barely realizing this fact.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I did not feel that her act was at all a heroic act. I think that even though she didn’t want her children to be like her and only live to please others, I think that her choice to leave was more selfish that giving. I think it was more of a decision that she made to make her self feel better about her own life. She was unhappy and just wanted to leave the husband whom she never even really loved from the start. She was tired of living her life for others and just wanted to be on her own. It’s sad that this actually happens a lot. So many people get married too young or to people that they don’t really love but it’s just the next step and then they realize later that they are unhappy and don’t know themselves so thaty leave. Unfortunately, their children are often the victims in that situation.
ReplyDeleteI agree that changing the ending and having Nora stay would completely change everything about the story children would change the meaning of the story drastically, it would take away the whole purpose. It is really the most important part of the entire story.
I think it was very heroic that she left. I like how you stated it "sparing her children." I didn't use that phrasing but I think it's very accurate and worded excellently. She was sparing them from ending up like her and while they might not understand at first they will be the better for her absence. It is self denial that she leave behind the one thing she loves most so she can be the mother they deserve, therefor very heroic to me. I should also say though, that this wouldn't be heroic if she didn't know her children would be loved and cared for completely before leaving. I don't see it as abandonment but more as rehab, she needs to figure out who the hell she is or how is she ever going to teach her children to find their own voices in this world? I like that you said it was a "sudden disillusionment", I couldn't agree with you more. Her life needed to be shattered for her to grow. She lost her "rosy spectacles" and finally saw the world for what it was. Now she needs to readdress herself in this new world in order to be what her children need. I liked your assessment, very insightful.
ReplyDeleteI was a little torn myself between whether her leaving her family was a heroic act or not; in some ways it was but in many others, it’s not. I do think that she did have the right idea to leave her husband to stand up for herself as a woman and supporting the feminist movement; however, as it comes to leaving your children, anything that has anything to do with leaving them is far from heroic. Even though she did it so they wouldn’t end up like her and she did leave them with someone who she herself saw as a mother figure in her life, I don’t think leaving them with someone else was a wise decision on her part. I do agree with you in a sense that it would completely change the dynamic of the story if she decided to stay; however, I would see that as more of a heroic act rather than simply leaving them behind. She could teach them from her first hand experience to learn from her mistakes and she them the error of her ways to let them become better people through her experiences.
ReplyDeleteGreat work on the blog! You did a very good job addressing all the questions asked. Once I was done reading it, I had no questions for you, only, how long did this kind of analysis take you? :) I agree that if she didn't leave it would change the story drastically. Then she would have never followed what her father and husband believed in...and well, it would change everything! I also liked how you said that making a story have a bad ending doesn't necessarily make it a bad story. I know that we as Americans are used to happy endings simply because that is just how we do it in this country. I do know that in other countries, it is common to find a story with an unhappy ending. This doesn't make it bad, it might even make it better...more dramatic and realistic. We can almost predict what will happen in our American stories because of the fact that they end it happily every single time. I think it would add a lot more spice to the story if she stayed. I think that you could add a lot more to the story if this were to happen.
ReplyDelete